BV 155: The high altitude interceptor

From 'B' to 'C' version

• • •

The overall development of the BV 155 involves plenty of politics and also miscommunication between the involved companies, mainly Blohm & Voss and Messerschmitt. This is well described in Dan Sharp's book, 'Secret Projects of the Luftwaffe 2, Blohm & Voss BV 155. A prototype of the 'B' version, with wing mounted radiators, was built and tested late in WW2. Apparently, B&V was not entirely happy with the design and started to design a new version of the aircraft, the type 'C'. Characteristic for this version is a central intake at the nose of the fuselage, that serves as air intake for both the engine coolers and for the TKL 15 turbo charger. The Hirth TKL 15 supercharger was a vital aspect of the high altitude interceptor, since it would provide sufficient oxygen to the engine even at higher altitudes. It was positioned behind the pilot and would feed compressed air back into the DB 603 via a long pipe situated outside the fuselage skin. Exhaust gases from the engine would spin a turbine that in turn would run the compressor transporting air at higher pressure back to the engine.

There is only limited information available on the 'C' version. But overall the fuselage and wing were similar in design to the 'B'. The main difference was, as described, the shape and size of the air intakes. The underlying idea by B&V was most likely to improve the overall design without having the change too much of the structure. Since that would have meant all new tooling and design work. With that assumption, a lot of the available information on the 'B' version can hence be assumed to also be representative of the 'C' version.

BV 166 C rendering.

Of the 'C' variant, a wooden mockup and several fuselage components were constructed. But no complete aircraft. The overall shape of the aircraft is assumed to be identical to the 'B' variant, apart from the chin mounted air intake.

Hirth TKL 15

The Hirth TKL-15 supercharger was a large piece of equipment and a central aspect of the aircraft. Two vertical intakes would feed exhaust gases through the turbine of the TKL-15. Compressed air from the compressor would exit from a pipe at the top.

By compressing the air, its temperature will also be increased. So it needs to pass through an intercooler on its way back to the engine.

General supercharger setup.

A tubular frame would hold the TKL-15 in place in the rear of the fuselage, see image below (image courtesy Tom Fey). It is unclear if the frame also was part of the main load path to support a stressed skin design. In any case, the frame would provide the required attachment points for the installed subsystems.

Supercharger installation frame (photo by Tom Frey)
Image courtesy: Thomas Fey

It is believed that the TKL-15 carried the internal designation 9-2279, as shown in the image below.

Image courtesy: Thomas Fey

Below is a cross section drawing of the device. The turbine could be bypassed by opening a control flap (ger. Regelklappe).

Image courtesy: Thomas Fey

The image below depicts the TKL-15 in a test stand.

Image courtesy: Thomas Fey

The image below depicts the mockup of the BV 155 B, with a view from the rear of the fuselage. Hatches to the turbo charger compartment have been opened, granting access to the systems located here. A tubular frame is installed, most likely in order to provide attachment points and also to transfer loads between the front and rear of the fuselage. Since the hatches have interrupted the stressed skin load path of the fuselage.

Rear view of the fuselage mock up.

A close up of the turbo charger compartment. B

Tube charger compartment.

The radiator installed in the chin intake of the aircraft featured exhaust slats that would control the mass flow of the incoming air that would pass through the heat exchangers. A certain amount of air was redirected to the rear of the aircraft with a splitter plate to feed the supercharger, see image below (source). So in contrast to the 'B' version, the 'C' would combine air for the turbo charger and heat exchangers into a single intake, leaving the wings unobstructed.

Chin air intake of the BV 155 C (Source: Secret Projects of the Luftwaffe: Blohm & Voss BV 155 Dan Sharp).

A cross section of the 155 'C' was published by Monogram, see below. These were prepared by Justo Miranda. What source material was used is unclear at this point. Compressed air exits the compressor that is below the exhaust level of the engine. It is redirected upwards the engine air intake, passing through an intercooler. Exhaust air of that intercooler exits the upper exhaust pipe on the starboard side of the aircraft. The lower exits on both sides of the fuselage are exhaust gas exits of the turbine. The larger one is used for the turbine and the smaller one as a direct bypass exhaust from the engine.

Side view of the BV 155 C as drawn by Justo Miranda.

Access hatches for the engine are displayed in the image below. Obviously, for the C type, access from the bottom would be blocked by the air intake.

Engine compartment as shown in the aircraft manual.

Main landing gear side view as designed for the BV 155 B, see image below. It would retract outward below the wing mounted radiators. That is not an option for the C. Here the landing gear needs to retract into the fuselage.

Main landing gear side view.

Main landing gear front view. It says 'Federstrebe (spring strut) from Ju 87 D-6' in writing.

Main landing gear front view.

Exhaust gas and compressed air pipes on the starboard side of the surviving BV 155.

Fuselage side view. Image source: http://www.aviation-history.com/garber/vg-bldg/blohm_155-7_f.html

Wing underside.

Wing underside. Image source: http://www.aviation-history.com/garber/vg-bldg/blohm_155-7_f.html

Rear fuselage.

Fuselage rear view. Image source: http://www.aviation-history.com/garber/vg-bldg/blohm_155-7_f.html

The only surviving sample in storage.

Front view. Image source: https://axis.classicwings.com/Luftwaffe/blohmvoss/blohmvoss.htm

Below is a picture of the engine compartment with open access hatches.

Opened engine compartment. Image source: https://axis.classicwings.com/Luftwaffe/blohmvoss/blohmvoss.htm

BV 155 B cockpit and instrument panel.

Instrument panel. Image source: https://axis.classicwings.com/Luftwaffe/blohmvoss/blohmvoss.htm
(Source: Secret Projects of the Luftwaffe: Blohm & Voss BV 155 Dan Sharp)
(Source: Secret Projects of the Luftwaffe: Blohm & Voss BV 155 Dan Sharp)

Main Sources:

  • Secret Projects of the Luftwaffe: Blohm & Voss BV 155 Dan Sharp
  • Höhenjäger Baubeschreibung BV Januar 1944
  • MONOGRAM CLOSE-UP 20: BLOHM & VOSS BV 155, Thomas H. Hitchcock
  • Thomas Fey

• • •

von Kristian Zimmermann 07 Juni, 2024
Description of the Junkers EF 110 kit development by my3dbase.
von noreply 07 Apr., 2024
Description of the Junkers EF 110 kit development by my3dbase.
von Kristian Zimmermann 24 Jan., 2024
Bubble Canopy Do 435- fictional
von noreply 18 Aug., 2023
ARADO E.395 model kit development
von noreply 11 Feb., 2023
The EMW A-6 looks definitely cool enough to justify making a model kit for it. And as far as I know, there is no 1:48 scale model kit on the market currently. Some information from the www.nevingtonwarmuseum.com:
von Kristian Zimmermann 10 Okt., 2020
Damit Eure Kekse mit unseren Backförmchen so richtig gut funktionieren haben wir für euch ein paar Tips zusammengestellt. Vorab einmal das Rezept: 100 g Butter 50 g Puderzucker (kann dem eigenen Geschmack angepasst werden) 30 g Ei 200 g Mehl Die Mengen können unter Einhaltung des Mischungsverhältnisses erhöht werden. Zunächst wird der Puderzucker mit der Butter vermengt. Danach wir das Ei hinzugegeben. Anschließend wird das Mehl untergehoben. Wichtig: Damit der Teig die richtige Konsistenz erhält sollte er gekühlt werden; ca 30min im Gefrierfach oder 1-2 Stunden im Kühlschrank.
von Kristian Zimmermann 07 Feb., 2020
The PATHFINDER is essentially based on the standard NG-2. But it features a full auto mechanism, voltage indicator and safety catch. Max fps is 130, the rate of fire is approximately 900darts/min.
von Kristian Zimmermann 07 Feb., 2020
For this blaster we had to iterate ourselves through 17 different versions. Most deisgn solutions implemented on half- or full length darts where not applikable due to the different type of ammunition. Lets quickly dive into the main design drivers of this blaster.
von Kristian Zimmermann 05 Feb., 2020
The NG-2 GOBLIN was designed in 2019 and basically follows the design philosophy of the original NG-1. But, as always, you learn. So the NG-2 was an effort to reduce the overall complexity of a blaster while optimizing it for easy printing and quick assembly. After all, 3Dprinting is rather scalable by simply investing in new machines. However, post processing, assembly, testing and shipping quickly become bottlenecks in production.
von Kristian Zimmermann 05 Feb., 2020
We use 3D printers to produce our products. There are different types of printers and countless different processes. We have specialized in what is sometimes revered to as FFF (fuse filament fabrication). The process is rather cost effective and uses a simple process of depositing a thermoplastic material layer by layer. 3D printing technology used to be locked down by patents for decades, limiting the technology to large and costly machines. Once those patents ran out, a new generation of desktop printers started to emerge. These machines are rather simple in design, but manage to output parts with astounding quality. Also, due to the small investment costs, the process can now be parallelized which has a profund influence on production costs. At the core of all this, is the material. After all, it is the material in combination with a specific design that enables a desired functionality. And today, in 2020, PLA or 'polylactic acid' is one of the most widespread materials in desktop 3D printing. PLA outperforms almost any other material in this category in terms of strength and stiffness (yes, those are two different things ;)). An interesting comparison is published by simplfy3d here . This is especially true if we take into account the directional dependency of the material properties which is introduced by the FFF process. Out of plane strength, i.e. layer adhesion, suffers greatly for most materials. The overall knock down for PLA is relatively low.
Weitere Beiträge
Share by: