Bubble Canopy Do 435- fictional

Based on current knowledge, the Do 435 is believed to have been a variant of the 335 featuring a side-by-side cockpit (Monogram Close-Up 21).


"A post-war allied intelligence report stated that the Do 435 was a modified version of the Do 335 with a wider cockpit previously mentioned, cabin pressurization, radar equipment and long-span wooden outer wing panels. The project was to be powered by two 2500 hp Jumo 222 engines."

Manfred Griehl in his book 'Dornier Do335, 435, 635' comes to a similar conclusion. He does quote an original overview from the Dornier factory:


"Die Do 435 stellt die folgerichtige Weiterentwicklung der Do 335 als Zweisitzer dar."


"The Do 435 represents the logical advancement of the Do 335 as a two-seater."

The reader will notice that most sources are secondary sources. More about that later.

In some sources (Source: Miranda), the 435-222 is also referred to as the P.238. That does in fact seem unlikely since the P.238.1 is fairly well documented (Source: Dornier Do 335, 435, 635 Manfred Griehl), see image below. 


Cross section and general layout of the Do 435 two-seater.

There is also an unverified version rumored to have been equipped with two Jumo 222 engines and a bubble canopy, which occasionally surfaces online and in some print media. Despite the absence of any documented evidence, the concept remains captivating enough to consider developing a model kit, even though it currently resides in the realm of speculative designs. For the sake of clarity, the version shall be referred to as the 435-222. 


 The fuselage of the 435-222 was seemingly extended, thereby increasing the overall weight of the aircraft. A larger wing would hence be plausible and here the P.237/3 might serve as a basis (Source: Dornier Do 335, 435, 635 Manfred Griehl). 

Several drawings of the 435-222 can be found online, see below.

Source: secretprojects.co.uk
Source: Dornier Do 335, Karl Heinz Regnat
Source: Justo Miranda secret projects.co.uk

According to the Dornier Museum (E-Mail 19.09.2023) most Dornier documents were burned towards the end of the war. So, if there ever was any documentation to support a bubble canopy, Jumo 222 powered 435, it is now forever lost. It is however not completely unlikely that these design features were at some point considered by Dornier engineers in their quest to boost aircraft performance. 


The fact that no information on the aircraft is available, implies that the design has to be reverse engineered. This is accomplished by combining know subsystems with characteristics design features of the 335. After all, the design would most likely be based largely on the 335. For the subsystems, information, auch as drawings and images, are available.



General characteristics

Crew: 1

Length: 17.3 m

Wingspan: 18.3 m

Height: 4.7 m

Powerplant: 2 × Jumo 222 E / F:, with two-stage two-speed centrifugal supercharger and trio of aftercoolers. The Jumo 222 E/F’s maximum power at 3,000 rpm was 2,500 hp (1,864 kW) for takeoff and 1,930 hp (1,439 kW) at 29,528 ft (9,000 m). Climbing power at 2,700 rpm was 2,220 hp (1,655 kW) at sea level and 1,680 hp (1,253 kW) at 36,000 ft. Cruising power at 2,500 rpm was 1,840 hp (1,372 kW) at sea level and 1,400 hp (1,044 kW) at 34,689 ft (11,000 m). 

(Source: https://oldmachinepress.com/2021/06/05/junkers-jumo-222-aircraft-engine/) 


Guns: 2x MG 151 20mm and 2x MK 103 30mm (wing mounted)



So here are a few drawings and renderings from that design process. The model is available HERE.

von Kristian Zimmermann 7. Juni 2024
Description of the Junkers EF 110 kit development by my3dbase.
von noreply 7. April 2024
Description of the Junkers EF 110 kit development by my3dbase.
von noreply 29. September 2023
Focke Wulf with BMW 802 engines- model kit development
von noreply 18. August 2023
ARADO E.395 model kit development
von noreply 11. Februar 2023
The EMW A-6 looks definitely cool enough to justify making a model kit for it. And as far as I know, there is no 1:48 scale model kit on the market currently. Some information from the www.nevingtonwarmuseum.com:
von Kristian Zimmermann 10. Oktober 2020
Damit Eure Kekse mit unseren Backförmchen so richtig gut funktionieren haben wir für euch ein paar Tips zusammengestellt. Vorab einmal das Rezept: 100 g Butter 50 g Puderzucker (kann dem eigenen Geschmack angepasst werden) 30 g Ei 200 g Mehl Die Mengen können unter Einhaltung des Mischungsverhältnisses erhöht werden. Zunächst wird der Puderzucker mit der Butter vermengt. Danach wir das Ei hinzugegeben. Anschließend wird das Mehl untergehoben. Wichtig: Damit der Teig die richtige Konsistenz erhält sollte er gekühlt werden; ca 30min im Gefrierfach oder 1-2 Stunden im Kühlschrank.
von Kristian Zimmermann 7. Februar 2020
The PATHFINDER is essentially based on the standard NG-2. But it features a full auto mechanism, voltage indicator and safety catch. Max fps is 130, the rate of fire is approximately 900darts/min.
von Kristian Zimmermann 7. Februar 2020
For this blaster we had to iterate ourselves through 17 different versions. Most deisgn solutions implemented on half- or full length darts where not applikable due to the different type of ammunition. Lets quickly dive into the main design drivers of this blaster.
von Kristian Zimmermann 5. Februar 2020
The NG-2 GOBLIN was designed in 2019 and basically follows the design philosophy of the original NG-1. But, as always, you learn. So the NG-2 was an effort to reduce the overall complexity of a blaster while optimizing it for easy printing and quick assembly. After all, 3Dprinting is rather scalable by simply investing in new machines. However, post processing, assembly, testing and shipping quickly become bottlenecks in production.
von Kristian Zimmermann 5. Februar 2020
We use 3D printers to produce our products. There are different types of printers and countless different processes. We have specialized in what is sometimes revered to as FFF (fuse filament fabrication). The process is rather cost effective and uses a simple process of depositing a thermoplastic material layer by layer. 3D printing technology used to be locked down by patents for decades, limiting the technology to large and costly machines. Once those patents ran out, a new generation of desktop printers started to emerge. These machines are rather simple in design, but manage to output parts with astounding quality. Also, due to the small investment costs, the process can now be parallelized which has a profund influence on production costs. At the core of all this, is the material. After all, it is the material in combination with a specific design that enables a desired functionality. And today, in 2020, PLA or 'polylactic acid' is one of the most widespread materials in desktop 3D printing. PLA outperforms almost any other material in this category in terms of strength and stiffness (yes, those are two different things ;)). An interesting comparison is published by simplfy3d here . This is especially true if we take into account the directional dependency of the material properties which is introduced by the FFF process. Out of plane strength, i.e. layer adhesion, suffers greatly for most materials. The overall knock down for PLA is relatively low.
Weitere Beiträge
Share by: