Focke Wulf with BMW 802 engines- model kit development

Initially, it was hypothesized that this design was fundamentally based on the FW 190 fuselage, essentially a standard FW 190 modified to integrate the large BMW 802 engine. This hypothesis is further substantiated by several references in the literature, such as those provided by H. Norwarra.

If this assumption were correct, the depicted shape of the fuselage must be somewhat inaccurate. The fuselage appears disproportionately short, and the configuration of the vertical tail plane (VTP) deviates significantly from that of the Focke-Wulf 190. The design, as initially proposed by Dipl.-Ing. Ludwig Mittelhuber, lacks a verifiable source according to luft46.com. Mittelhuber was reportedly involved in various Focke-Wulf projects, including the TW 200 and Ta 154.

Integration study FW 190

The images below depict a prospective integration of the BMW 8011 engine into an FW 190 fuselage. It is evident that the outer circumference of the BMW 8011 engine is significantly larger compared to the standard BMW 801. Additionally, the engine has an increased length. These differences would necessitate extensive modifications to the fuselage, both to the overall structure and to accommodate the resultant shift in the center of gravity.

Source Material (primary)

Further sources are required for comprehensive analysis. Subsequent investigation yielded a drawing of a Focke Wulf aircraft equipped with a BMW 802 engine. The dimensions of the drawing are 14 cm by 10 cm. Evidence on the reverse side suggests it was likely discovered by Heinz Norwarra.

H. Norwarra states the following in his book (Die Deutsche Luftrüstung 1933-1945), we're the same image is shown:


Weiterentwicklung FW 190 D mit 18-Zylinder BMW 802 Startleistung 2450 PS. Propellerhaube vorn offen für Kühlluftzuführung. Bewaffnung 4 MK, zwei über Motor, zwei in Flügelwurzel. Spannweite 13,00 m, Länge 11,15 m. 


Engl.


 Further development FW 190 D with 18-cylinder BMW 802 starting power 2450 hp. Propeller hood open at the front for cooling air supply. Armament 4 MK, two over engine, two in wing root. Span 13.00 m, length 11.15 m.


Strangely enough, it is described by Norwarra as a development of the FW 190 D. Nothing seems to support that statement at this point.

According to Gunston (2006), the development of the BMW 802 engine was discontinued in 1942, coinciding with the completion of the first D-0 model. The armament depicted in the drawing includes two MK 108 cannons positioned above the engine, a configuration that appears impractical given the limited available space. Contrary to this, luft46.com asserts that the aircraft was unarmed. Based on my assessment, a more plausible armament configuration would include two MG 131 machine guns, supplemented by MK 108 cannons mounted in the wings.


Reference:

Gunston, B. (2006). World Encyclopedia of Aero Engines: From the Pioneers to the Present Day (5th ed.). Stroud, UK: Sutton. ISBN 0-7509-4479-X.


Furthermore, in 'Flugzeug Classic 2/2005' a gentleman called Horst Lob (Bremen) published the following image, in the section ' letter to the editor'.  This is the only source of a counter rotating prop configuration.


Apart from the image, the gentleman could not provide further information apart from some speculation. The image was titled 'Entwurf with BMW 8011' But, this is indeed the first 3- view drawing of that FW with the infamous BMW 8011.


As for the BMW 8011, the following statement were found on the https://www.secretprojects.co.uk/ forum:


From BMW Aero Engines by Jakobs, Kroschel, and Piere... "33 projects codenamed P 8000 to P 8032 are documented for the period up to April 1942 alone. All of them were either based on the BMW 801 (13 projects) or on the 802 (20 projects). For the most part, the main focus of the documented projects was on internal and external engine aerodynamics, looking for example at charge-air and cooling air feed, or at a double spinner with or without an inlet cone."


This seems to support the assumption that the BWM P.8011 was a sub-version of the 802 (or 801?). Information about that engine was at some point forwarded to BMW which integrated it into their design. As an example, P.8008 is depicted below. Wikipedia suggests two turbochargers for the P.8011. I do not have access to any source supporting that statement. P.8011 might as well featured 3 turbo chargers as P.8008.

The wing of the Mittelhuber fighter also differs significantly from the FW 190 wing, see below (compared here to FW 190 D-9 wing). The sweep angle of the leading edge is smaller, the wing tip pointier. Wing span is 13.00 m compared to 10.51 m for the D-9. 

Overall. I have to assume, that Mittelhuber's design is not closely based on the 190 after all. Also, FW/ Mittelhuber would sporadically update the design with input from BMW, that was working on numerous sub- versions for the BMW 802. So at this point it can also be concluded that this aircraft was not a sub- variant of the FW 190. 

The model kit (1/48 and 1/72) is available here: LINK


von Kristian Zimmermann 7. Juni 2024
Description of the Junkers EF 110 kit development by my3dbase.
von noreply 7. April 2024
Description of the Junkers EF 110 kit development by my3dbase.
von Kristian Zimmermann 24. Januar 2024
Bubble Canopy Do 435- fictional
von noreply 18. August 2023
ARADO E.395 model kit development
von noreply 11. Februar 2023
The EMW A-6 looks definitely cool enough to justify making a model kit for it. And as far as I know, there is no 1:48 scale model kit on the market currently. Some information from the www.nevingtonwarmuseum.com:
von Kristian Zimmermann 10. Oktober 2020
Damit Eure Kekse mit unseren Backförmchen so richtig gut funktionieren haben wir für euch ein paar Tips zusammengestellt. Vorab einmal das Rezept: 100 g Butter 50 g Puderzucker (kann dem eigenen Geschmack angepasst werden) 30 g Ei 200 g Mehl Die Mengen können unter Einhaltung des Mischungsverhältnisses erhöht werden. Zunächst wird der Puderzucker mit der Butter vermengt. Danach wir das Ei hinzugegeben. Anschließend wird das Mehl untergehoben. Wichtig: Damit der Teig die richtige Konsistenz erhält sollte er gekühlt werden; ca 30min im Gefrierfach oder 1-2 Stunden im Kühlschrank.
von Kristian Zimmermann 7. Februar 2020
The PATHFINDER is essentially based on the standard NG-2. But it features a full auto mechanism, voltage indicator and safety catch. Max fps is 130, the rate of fire is approximately 900darts/min.
von Kristian Zimmermann 7. Februar 2020
For this blaster we had to iterate ourselves through 17 different versions. Most deisgn solutions implemented on half- or full length darts where not applikable due to the different type of ammunition. Lets quickly dive into the main design drivers of this blaster.
von Kristian Zimmermann 5. Februar 2020
The NG-2 GOBLIN was designed in 2019 and basically follows the design philosophy of the original NG-1. But, as always, you learn. So the NG-2 was an effort to reduce the overall complexity of a blaster while optimizing it for easy printing and quick assembly. After all, 3Dprinting is rather scalable by simply investing in new machines. However, post processing, assembly, testing and shipping quickly become bottlenecks in production.
von Kristian Zimmermann 5. Februar 2020
We use 3D printers to produce our products. There are different types of printers and countless different processes. We have specialized in what is sometimes revered to as FFF (fuse filament fabrication). The process is rather cost effective and uses a simple process of depositing a thermoplastic material layer by layer. 3D printing technology used to be locked down by patents for decades, limiting the technology to large and costly machines. Once those patents ran out, a new generation of desktop printers started to emerge. These machines are rather simple in design, but manage to output parts with astounding quality. Also, due to the small investment costs, the process can now be parallelized which has a profund influence on production costs. At the core of all this, is the material. After all, it is the material in combination with a specific design that enables a desired functionality. And today, in 2020, PLA or 'polylactic acid' is one of the most widespread materials in desktop 3D printing. PLA outperforms almost any other material in this category in terms of strength and stiffness (yes, those are two different things ;)). An interesting comparison is published by simplfy3d here . This is especially true if we take into account the directional dependency of the material properties which is introduced by the FFF process. Out of plane strength, i.e. layer adhesion, suffers greatly for most materials. The overall knock down for PLA is relatively low.
Weitere Beiträge
Share by: